In healthcare, data is the backbone of informed decision-making. Whether tracking infection rates or evaluating how antibiotics are prescribed, providers need methods to assess what’s happening in their facilities. One such method is the point prevalence study (PPS), a cross-sectional approach that captures how many individuals in a population have a certain condition or characteristic at a specific point in time. PPS provide a simple and affordable way to collect data, but they come with limitations that can affect how the data is interpreted and used. In today's post, we'll explore the pros and cons of this popular study design.
In healthcare, data is the backbone of informed decision-making. Whether tracking infection rates or evaluating how antibiotics are prescribed, providers need methods to assess what’s happening in their facilities. One such method is the point prevalence study (PPS), a cross-sectional approach that captures how many individuals in a population have a certain condition or characteristic at a specific point in time. PPS provide a simple and affordable way to collect data, but they come with limitations that can affect how the data is interpreted and used. In today's post, we'll explore the pros and cons of this popular study design.
